AMD Baffin
VS
Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
AMD Baffin
VS
Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Baffin  vs  Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.

not rated
Place in performance rating
377
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Baffin
Code name
Tiger Lake Xe
Desktop
Type
Laptop
no data
Release date
15 August 2020 (1 year ago)
$78
Price now
no data
4.0
GCN generation
no data
Baffin
GPU code name
Tiger Lake Xe
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Baffin  vs  Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

1024
Pipelines
96
855 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
3,000 million
Transistor count
no data
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
10 nm
80 W
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
1024
Pipelines / CUDA cores
96
3,000 million
Number of transistors
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Baffin and Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Baffin vs Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.

Memory type
DDR4
Shared memory
+

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Baffin vs Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

Quick Sync
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Baffin and Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (12_0)
DirectX
DirectX 12_1
4.6
OpenGL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Baffin and Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Baffin or Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Baffin
Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Baffin
Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Baffin
Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Baffin
Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Baffin
Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Baffin

More pipelines (1024 vs 96)

G-SYNC support

VR Ready

Multi Monitor

Advantages of Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

24.07% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (10 nm vs 14 nm)

So, AMD Baffin or Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 .

AMD Baffin versus Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 3 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score