NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
VS
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
VS
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile  vs  AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL.

219
Place in performance rating
222
Turing
Architecture
Vega
TU117
Code name
Polaris 22
Mobile workstation
Type
Mobile workstation
27 May 2019 (2 years ago)
Release date
7 January 2018 (3 years ago)
$2221
Price now
$1359
5.57
Value for money
7.72
N19P-Q3
GPU code name
Vega Kaby Lake-G
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile  vs  AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

1024
Pipelines
1280
1575 MHz
Core clock speed
931 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1011 MHz
4,700 million
Transistor count
5,000 million
12 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
60 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
65 Watt
114.2
Texture fill rate
80.88
1024
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1280
1785 MHz
Boost clock speed
1011 MHz
4,700 million
Number of transistors
5,000 million
60 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
65 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
IGP
medium sized
Laptop size
medium sized

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL.

GDDR5
Memory type
HBM2
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
1024 Bit
8000 MHz
Memory clock speed
1400 MHz
128.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile or AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

1.05% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 14 nm)

Less power consumption (60 Watt vs 65 Watt)

Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

Cheaper ($1359 vs $2221)

More pipelines (1280 vs 1024)

More memory bandwidth (179.2 GB/s vs 128.0 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile or AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile .

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile versus AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

4.2 Out of 24 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score