NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
VS
AMD FirePro 2270
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
VS
AMD FirePro 2270

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M和AMD FirePro 2270之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

995
业绩排名中的位置
1066
没有数据
物有所值
1.63
Curie
建筑学
TeraScale 2
G71
代码名称
Cedar
Workstation
类型
Workstation
21 August 2006 (15 years ago)
发布日期
31 January 2011 (10 years ago)
$105
当前价格
$100
0.03
物有所值
没有数据
G71
图形处理器的代码名称
Cedar
Workstation
市场部分
Workstation

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M 与 AMD FirePro 2270 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

没有数据
输送机
80
450 MHz
核心时钟频率
600 MHz
278 million
晶体管的数量
292 million
90 nm
技术过程
40 nm
35 Watt
消耗功率
15 Watt
10.80
每秒处理的文本数
4.800
没有数据
浮点运算
96 gflops
没有数据
转换器/CUDA核心
80
278 million
晶体管的数量
292 million
35 Watt
设计热量输出
15 Watt

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M}和AMD FirePro 2270}}}}}}的图形卡NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M}。

PCIe 1.0 x16
介面
PCIe 2.0 x16
没有数据
长度
170 mm
没有数据
补充喂养
None

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M 和AMD FirePro 2270 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

GDDR3
存储器类型
GDDR3
256 MB
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
128 Bit
存储器总线容量
64 Bit
1200 MHz
存储器频率
1200 MHz
19.2 GB/s
内存带宽
9.6 GB/s

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M和AMD FirePro 2270的图形卡NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M。

No outputs
与显示器的连接
1x DMS-59

API 支持

两个对手 NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M 和 AMD FirePro 2270 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M 和 AMD FirePro 2270 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M 查明是否 AMD FirePro 2270 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
AMD FirePro 2270
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
AMD FirePro 2270
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
AMD FirePro 2270
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
AMD FirePro 2270
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
AMD FirePro 2270
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M

0.12% 在测试中更快

大的内存带宽 (19.2 GB/s vs 9.6 GB/s)

优势 AMD FirePro 2270

更加便宜 ($100 vs $105)

大的内存带宽 (40 nm vs 90 nm)

更少的电力消耗 (15 Watt vs 35 Watt)

最大的RAM尺寸 (512 MB vs 256 MB)

So, NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M or AMD FirePro 2270?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M .

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M versus AMD FirePro 2270 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

用户评价

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 2 Hitesti Score