AMD Radeon R7 350
VS
NVIDIA Tesla M2090
AMD Radeon R7 350
VS
NVIDIA Tesla M2090

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定AMD Radeon R7 350和NVIDIA Tesla M2090之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

not rated
业绩排名中的位置
not rated
0.08
物有所值
没有数据
GCN 1.0
建筑学
Fermi 2.0
Cape Verde
代码名称
GF110
Desktop
类型
Workstation
6 July 2016 (5 years ago)
发布日期
25 July 2011 (10 years ago)
$12.88
当前价格
$172
Cape Verde
图形处理器的代码名称
GF110
Desktop
市场部分
Workstation

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,AMD Radeon R7 350 与 NVIDIA Tesla M2090 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

512
输送机
512
800 MHz
核心时钟频率
651 MHz
1,500 million
晶体管的数量
3,000 million
28 nm
技术过程
40 nm
55 Watt
消耗功率
250 Watt
25.60
每秒处理的文本数
41.66
819.2 gflops
浮点运算
1,331.2 gflops
512
转换器/CUDA核心
512
1,500 million
晶体管的数量
3,000 million
55 Watt
设计热量输出
250 Watt

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡AMD Radeon R7 350}和NVIDIA Tesla M2090}}}}}}的图形卡AMD Radeon R7 350}。

PCIe 3.0 x16
介面
PCIe 2.0 x16
168 mm
长度
248 mm
None
补充喂养
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. AMD Radeon R7 350 和NVIDIA Tesla M2090 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

GDDR5
存储器类型
GDDR5
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
128 Bit
存储器总线容量
384 Bit
4500 MHz
存储器频率
3696 MHz
72 GB/s
内存带宽
177.4 GB/s

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡AMD Radeon R7 350和NVIDIA Tesla M2090的图形卡AMD Radeon R7 350。

1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
与显示器的连接
No outputs
+
HDMI
没有数据

API 支持

两个对手 AMD Radeon R7 350 和 NVIDIA Tesla M2090 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 AMD Radeon R7 350 和 NVIDIA Tesla M2090 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 AMD Radeon R7 350 查明是否 NVIDIA Tesla M2090 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R7 350
NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R7 350
NVIDIA Tesla M2090
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R7 350
NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R7 350
NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R7 350
NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 AMD Radeon R7 350

更加便宜 ($12.88 vs $172)

大的内存带宽 (28 nm vs 40 nm)

更少的电力消耗 (55 Watt vs 250 Watt)

优势 NVIDIA Tesla M2090

48.98% 在测试中更快

最大的RAM尺寸 (6 GB vs 2 GB)

大的内存带宽 (177.4 GB/s vs 72 GB/s)

So, AMD Radeon R7 350 or NVIDIA Tesla M2090?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 NVIDIA Tesla M2090 .

AMD Radeon R7 350 versus NVIDIA Tesla M2090 基准测试中的比较

用户评价

4.4 Out of 35 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 7 Hitesti Score