AMD FirePro V4900
VS
FirePro V4800
AMD FirePro V4900
VS
FirePro V4800

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定AMD FirePro V4900和FirePro V4800之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

656
业绩排名中的位置
not rated
TeraScale 2
建筑学
TeraScale 2
Turks
代码名称
没有数据
Workstation
类型
没有数据
1 November 2011 (10 years ago)
发布日期
26 April 2010 (11 years ago)
没有数据
初始价格
$189
$121
当前价格
$124 (0.7x MSRP)
0.81
物有所值
没有数据
Turks
图形处理器的代码名称
Redwood
Workstation
市场部分
Workstation

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,AMD FirePro V4900 与 FirePro V4800 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

480
输送机
没有数据
800 MHz
核心时钟频率
775 MHz
716 million
晶体管的数量
没有数据
40 nm
技术过程
40 nm
75 Watt
消耗功率
没有数据
19.20
每秒处理的文本数
15.50
768.0 gflops
浮点运算
620.0 gflops
480
转换器/CUDA核心
400
716 million
晶体管的数量
627 million
75 Watt
设计热量输出
69 Watt

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡AMD FirePro V4900}和FirePro V4800}}}}}}的图形卡AMD FirePro V4900}。

PCIe 2.0 x16
介面
PCIe 2.0 x16
163 mm
长度
168 mm
None
补充喂养
None

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. AMD FirePro V4900 和FirePro V4800 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

GDDR5
存储器类型
GDDR5
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
128 Bit
存储器总线容量
128 Bit
4000 MHz
存储器频率
3600 MHz
64 GB/s
内存带宽
57.6 GB/s

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡AMD FirePro V4900和FirePro V4800的图形卡AMD FirePro V4900。

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
与显示器的连接
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API 支持

两个对手 AMD FirePro V4900 和 FirePro V4800 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
没有数据
Vulkan
N/A
没有数据
Shader Model
5.0
没有数据
OpenCL
1.2

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 AMD FirePro V4900 和 FirePro V4800 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 AMD FirePro V4900 查明是否 FirePro V4800 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD FirePro V4900
FirePro V4800
Death Stranding (2020) AMD FirePro V4900
FirePro V4800
F1 2020 (2020) AMD FirePro V4900
FirePro V4800
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD FirePro V4900
FirePro V4800
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD FirePro V4900
FirePro V4800
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 AMD FirePro V4900

6.1% 在测试中更快

更加便宜 ($121 vs $124 (0.7x MSRP))

大的内存带宽 (64 GB/s vs 57.6 GB/s)

优势 FirePro V4800

There is no accountable advantage

So, AMD FirePro V4900 or FirePro V4800?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 AMD FirePro V4900 .

AMD FirePro V4900 versus FirePro V4800 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

用户评价

3.3 Out of 9 Hitesti Score
3.5 Out of 24 Hitesti Score