NVIDIA TITAN RTX
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
NVIDIA TITAN RTX
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA TITAN RTX  vs  NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700.

24
Place in performance rating
922
8.38
Value for money (0-100)
5.05
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TU102
Code name
G92
Desktop
Type
Workstation
18 December 2018 (2 years ago)
Release date
8 January 2008 (13 years ago)
$2,499
Launch price (MSRP)
$1,599
$2723 (1.1x MSRP)
Price now
$88 (0.1x MSRP)
5.99
Value for money
0.11
TU102
GPU code name
G92
Desktop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA TITAN RTX  vs  NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

4608
Pipelines
112
1350 MHz
Core clock speed
500 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
18,600 million
Transistor count
754 million
12 nm
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
280 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
78 Watt
509.8
Texture fill rate
28.00
no data
Floating-point performance
280 gflops
4608
Pipelines / CUDA cores
112
1770 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
18,600 million
Number of transistors
754 million
280 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
78 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA TITAN RTX and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
267 mm
Length
267 mm
2x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700.

GDDR6
Memory type
GDDR3
24 GB
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
384 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
14000 MHz
Memory clock speed
1600 MHz
672.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
51.2 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700.

1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
+
HDMI
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA TITAN RTX and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 Ultimate (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA TITAN RTX and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA TITAN RTX or NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA TITAN RTX
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA TITAN RTX
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA TITAN RTX
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA TITAN RTX
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA TITAN RTX
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA TITAN RTX

85.66% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (4608 vs 112)

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 65 nm)

More memory bandwidth (672.0 GB/s vs 51.2 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

Cheaper ($88 (0.1x MSRP) vs $2723 (1.1x MSRP))

Less power consumption (78 Watt vs 280 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 24 GB)

So, NVIDIA TITAN RTX or NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA TITAN RTX .

NVIDIA TITAN RTX versus NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Ice Storm GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Ice Storm GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

492606 (100 %)

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

171714 (100 %)

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

24042 (100 %)

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

35447 (100 %)

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

49047 (100 %)

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

71673 (100 %)

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

18858 (100 %)

User rating

3.9 Out of 228 Hitesti Score
4.0 Out of 4 Hitesti Score