NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro CX
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro CX

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M  vs  NVIDIA Quadro CX.

1014
Place in performance rating
668
no data
Value for money (0-100)
7.22
GT2xx
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GT216
Code name
GT200B
Mobile workstation
Type
Workstation
7 January 2010 (11 years ago)
Release date
11 November 2008 (13 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$1,999
$980
Price now
$199 (0.1x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
0.46
N10P-GLM
GPU code name
GT200B
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M  vs  NVIDIA Quadro CX in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

48
Pipelines
192
550 MHz
Core clock speed
602 MHz
486 million
Transistor count
1,400 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
35 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
8.800
Texture fill rate
38.53
116.16 gflops
Floating-point performance
462.3 gflops
48
Pipelines / CUDA cores
192
486 million
Number of transistors
1,400 million
35 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
150 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M and NVIDIA Quadro CX come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

MXM-A (3.0)
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
267 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
medium sized
Laptop size
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro CX.

GDDR3, DDR3
Memory type
GDDR3
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
1536 MB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
384 Bit
790 MHz
Memory clock speed
1600 MHz
25.28 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro CX.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M and NVIDIA Quadro CX is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M and NVIDIA Quadro CX graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M or NVIDIA Quadro CX good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
NVIDIA Quadro CX
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
NVIDIA Quadro CX
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
NVIDIA Quadro CX
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
NVIDIA Quadro CX
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
NVIDIA Quadro CX
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 55 nm)

Less power consumption (35 Watt vs 150 Watt)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro CX

3.36% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($199 (0.1x MSRP) vs $980)

More pipelines (192 vs 48)

More maximum RAM amount (1536 MB vs 1 GB)

More memory bandwidth (76.8 GB/s vs 25.28 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M or NVIDIA Quadro CX?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro CX .

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M versus NVIDIA Quadro CX performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.2 Out of 6 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score