NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M  vs  NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI.

872
Place in performance rating
not rated
no data
Value for money (0-100)
0.16
G9x
Architecture
Rankine
G92
Code name
NV34 B1
Mobile workstation
Type
Workstation
23 February 2008 (13 years ago)
Release date
28 October 2003 (18 years ago)
$80
Price now
$93
0.15
Value for money
no data
NB8E-GLM
GPU code name
NV34 B1
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M  vs  NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

64
Pipelines
no data
500 MHz
Core clock speed
275 MHz
754 million
Transistor count
45 million
65 nm
Manufacturing process technology
150 nm
70 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
13 Watt
16.00
Texture fill rate
1.100
160 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
96
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
754 million
Number of transistors
45 million
70 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
13 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

MXM-HE
Interface
PCI
no data
Length
168 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
large
Laptop size
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI.

GDDR3
Memory type
DDR
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
64 MB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
800 MHz
Memory clock speed
500 MHz
51.14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
8 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x DMS-59

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

+
PCI-E 16x
no data
+
Gigathread technology
no data
+
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting)
no data
+
PowerMizer 7.0
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0a
3.3
OpenGL
1.5 (2.1)

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M or NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

2.12% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($80 vs $93)

Finer manufacturing process technology (65 nm vs 150 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 64 MB)

More memory bandwidth (51.14 GB/s vs 8 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI

Less power consumption (13 Watt vs 70 Watt)

So, NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M or NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M .

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M versus NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score