NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM.

not rated
Place in performance rating
1671
4.76
Value for money (0-100)
0.33
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
G84
Code name
GF119
Workstation
Type
Desktop
12 September 2007 (14 years ago)
Release date
20 August 2012
$699
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$190 (0.3x MSRP)
Price now
$82
G84
GPU code name
no data
Workstation
Market segment
no data

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

32
Pipelines
96
460 MHz
Core clock speed
589 MHz
289 million
Transistor count
292 million
80 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
42 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
29 Watt
7.360
Texture fill rate
9.424
58.88 gflops
Floating-point performance
269.2 gflops
32
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
289 million
Number of transistors
no data
42 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
168 mm
Length
145 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM.

DDR2
Memory type
DDR3
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
800 MHz
Memory clock speed
1000 MHz
25.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
8 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM.

2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 or NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

0.43% faster in synthetic tests

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 1 GB)

More memory bandwidth (25.6 GB/s vs 8 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM

Cheaper ($82 vs $190 (0.3x MSRP))

More pipelines (96 vs 32)

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 80 nm)

Less power consumption (29 Watt vs 42 Watt)

So, NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 or NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 .

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.3 Out of 3 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 23 Hitesti Score