Intel HD Graphics 3000
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Intel HD Graphics 3000
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Intel HD Graphics 3000  vs  NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700.

993
Place in performance rating
not rated
no data
Value for money (0-100)
4.76
Gen. 6 Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Tesla
Sandy Bridge GT2
Code name
G84
Laptop
Type
Workstation
1 February 2011 (10 years ago)
Release date
12 September 2007 (14 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$699
$476
Price now
$190 (0.3x MSRP)
0.01
Value for money
no data
Sandy Bridge
GPU code name
G84
Laptop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between Intel HD Graphics 3000  vs  NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

96
Pipelines
32
350 MHz
Core clock speed
460 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
995 million
Transistor count
289 million
32 nm
Manufacturing process technology
80 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
42 Watt
13.80
Texture fill rate
7.360
20.4 gflops
Floating-point performance
58.88 gflops
12
Pipelines / CUDA cores
32
1350 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
995 million
Number of transistors
289 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
42 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards Intel HD Graphics 3000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
no data
Length
168 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between Intel HD Graphics 3000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700.

System Shared
Memory type
DDR2
no data
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
64/128 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
25.6 GB/s
+
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between Intel HD Graphics 3000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700.

No outputs
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders Intel HD Graphics 3000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.1
OpenGL
3.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel HD Graphics 3000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel HD Graphics 3000 or NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel HD Graphics 3000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Death Stranding (2020) Intel HD Graphics 3000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
F1 2020 (2020) Intel HD Graphics 3000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel HD Graphics 3000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel HD Graphics 3000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 3000

0.64% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (96 vs 32)

Finer manufacturing process technology (32 nm vs 80 nm)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

Cheaper ($190 (0.3x MSRP) vs $476)

So, Intel HD Graphics 3000 or NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel HD Graphics 3000 .

Intel HD Graphics 3000 versus NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

2.8 Out of 206 Hitesti Score
3.3 Out of 3 Hitesti Score