NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI
VS
AMD FireStream 9270
NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI
VS
AMD FireStream 9270

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI  vs  AMD FireStream 9270.

1813
Place in performance rating
565
0.08
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Fermi
Architecture
TeraScale
GF100
Code name
RV770
Workstation
Type
Desktop
25 July 2011
Release date
13 November 2008 (13 years ago)
$11,499
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$340
Price now
no data
no data
GPU code name
RV770
no data
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI  vs  AMD FireStream 9270 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

448
Pipelines
800
574 MHz
Core clock speed
750 MHz
3,100 million
Transistor count
956 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
231 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
160 Watt
32.14
Texture fill rate
30.00
1,027.7 gflops
Floating-point performance
1,200.0 gflops
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
800
no data
Number of transistors
956 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
160 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI and AMD FireStream 9270 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
248 mm
Length
no data
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI vs AMD FireStream 9270.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
6 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
384 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
2988 MHz
Memory clock speed
3600 MHz
143.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
115.2 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI vs AMD FireStream 9270.

2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video, 2x SDI
Display Connectors
1x DVI

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI and AMD FireStream 9270 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI and AMD FireStream 9270 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI or AMD FireStream 9270 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI
AMD FireStream 9270
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI
AMD FireStream 9270
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI
AMD FireStream 9270
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI
AMD FireStream 9270
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI
AMD FireStream 9270
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 55 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (6 GB vs 2 GB)

More memory bandwidth (143.4 GB/s vs 115.2 GB/s)

Advantages of AMD FireStream 9270

6.1% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (800 vs 448)

Less power consumption (160 Watt vs 231 Watt)

So, NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI or AMD FireStream 9270?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD FireStream 9270 .

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI versus AMD FireStream 9270 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score