NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
VS
ATI FirePro M5800
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
VS
ATI FirePro M5800

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro 2000M  vs  ATI FirePro M5800.

717
Place in performance rating
643
20.01
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Fermi
Architecture
Terascale 2
GF106
Code name
Madison
Mobile workstation
Type
Mobile workstation
22 February 2011 (10 years ago)
Release date
1 March 2010 (11 years ago)
$46.56
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$135 (2.9x MSRP)
Price now
$60
0.46
Value for money
0.43
Fermi
GPU code name
Madison
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro 2000M  vs  ATI FirePro M5800 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

192
Pipelines
400
550 MHz
Core clock speed
650 MHz
1,170 million
Transistor count
627 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
55 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
26 Watt
17.60
Texture fill rate
13.00
422.4 gflops
Floating-point performance
520.0 gflops
192
Pipelines / CUDA cores
400
1,170 million
Number of transistors
627 million
55 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
26 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro 2000M and ATI FirePro M5800 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

MXM-A (3.0)
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
medium sized
Laptop size
medium sized

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs ATI FirePro M5800.

DDR3
Memory type
DDR3, GDDR5
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
900 MHz
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
28.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
51.2 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs ATI FirePro M5800.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro 2000M and ATI FirePro M5800 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro 2000M and ATI FirePro M5800 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro 2000M or ATI FirePro M5800 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
ATI FirePro M5800
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
ATI FirePro M5800
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
ATI FirePro M5800
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
ATI FirePro M5800
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
ATI FirePro M5800
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

0.39% faster in synthetic tests

More maximum RAM amount (2 GB vs 1 GB)

Advantages of ATI FirePro M5800

Cheaper ($60 vs $135 (2.9x MSRP))

More pipelines (400 vs 192)

Less power consumption (26 Watt vs 55 Watt)

More memory bandwidth (51.2 GB/s vs 28.8 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA Quadro 2000M or ATI FirePro M5800?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro 2000M .

NVIDIA Quadro 2000M versus ATI FirePro M5800 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Octane Render OctaneBench

Benchmark Octane Render OctaneBench: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Octane Render OctaneBench test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.1 Out of 8 Hitesti Score
3.0 Out of 2 Hitesti Score