NVIDIA NVS 810
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
NVIDIA NVS 810
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA NVS 810  vs  NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000.

614
Place in performance rating
not rated
1.41
Value for money (0-100)
0.47
Maxwell
Architecture
Rankine
GM107
Code name
NV35
Workstation
Type
Workstation
4 November 2015 (6 years ago)
Release date
22 July 2003 (18 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$203
$2098
Price now
$443 (2.2x MSRP)
0.32
Value for money
no data
GM107
GPU code name
NV35
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA NVS 810  vs  NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

512
Pipelines
no data
902 MHz
Core clock speed
400 MHz
1033 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
1,870 million
Transistor count
135 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
130 nm
68 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
33.06
Texture fill rate
3.200
2x 1,058 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
512
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
1033 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
1,870 million
Number of transistors
135 million
68 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA NVS 810 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
AGP 8x
198 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
1x Molex

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA NVS 810 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000.

DDR3
Memory type
DDR
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
256 MB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
1800 MHz
Memory clock speed
850 MHz
14.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
27.2 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA NVS 810 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000.

8x mini-DisplayPort
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA NVS 810 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0a
4.6
OpenGL
1.5 (2.1)

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA NVS 810 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA NVS 810 or NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA NVS 810
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA NVS 810
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA NVS 810
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA NVS 810
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA NVS 810
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA NVS 810

4.38% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 130 nm)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000

Cheaper ($443 (2.2x MSRP) vs $2098)

More maximum RAM amount (256 MB vs 2 GB)

More memory bandwidth (27.2 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA NVS 810 or NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA NVS 810 .

NVIDIA NVS 810 versus NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

1015 (100 %)

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score