NVIDIA NVS 510
VS
AMD FirePro V3900
NVIDIA NVS 510
VS
AMD FirePro V3900

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA NVS 510  vs  AMD FirePro V3900.

747
Place in performance rating
777
no data
Value for money (0-100)
6.37
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GK107
Code name
Turks
Workstation
Type
Workstation
23 October 2012 (9 years ago)
Release date
7 February 2012 (9 years ago)
$449
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$91 (0.2x MSRP)
Price now
$118
0.44
Value for money
0.36
GK107
GPU code name
Turks
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA NVS 510  vs  AMD FirePro V3900 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

192
Pipelines
480
797 MHz
Core clock speed
650 MHz
1,270 million
Transistor count
716 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
35 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
199 Watt
12.75
Texture fill rate
15.60
306.0 gflops
Floating-point performance
624.0 gflops
192
Pipelines / CUDA cores
480
1,270 million
Number of transistors
716 million
35 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
199 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA NVS 510 and AMD FirePro V3900 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
160 mm
Length
168 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Bus support
PCIe 2.1 x16
no data
Form factor
half height / half length

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD FirePro V3900.

DDR3
Memory type
GDDR3
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1782 MHz
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
28.51 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
28 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD FirePro V3900.

4x mini-DisplayPort
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
no data
Dual-link DVI support
1
no data
HD сomponent video output
1
no data
DisplayPort count
1

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA NVS 510 and AMD FirePro V3900 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA NVS 510 and AMD FirePro V3900 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA NVS 510 or AMD FirePro V3900 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA NVS 510
AMD FirePro V3900
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA NVS 510
AMD FirePro V3900
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA NVS 510
AMD FirePro V3900
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA NVS 510
AMD FirePro V3900
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA NVS 510
AMD FirePro V3900
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA NVS 510

0.26% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($91 (0.2x MSRP) vs $118)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

Less power consumption (35 Watt vs 199 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (2 GB vs 1 GB)

More memory bandwidth (28.51 GB/s vs 28 GB/s)

Advantages of AMD FirePro V3900

More pipelines (480 vs 192)

So, NVIDIA NVS 510 or AMD FirePro V3900?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA NVS 510 .

NVIDIA NVS 510 versus AMD FirePro V3900 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 5 Hitesti Score
4.4 Out of 18 Hitesti Score