NVIDIA GeForce 310M
VS
AMD Radeon 520
NVIDIA GeForce 310M
VS
AMD Radeon 520

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA GeForce 310M  vs  AMD Radeon 520.

not rated
Place in performance rating
719
GT2xx
Architecture
GCN 1.0
no data
Code name
Oland
no data
Type
Laptop
10 January 2010 (11 years ago)
Release date
21 March 2017 (4 years ago)
$163
Price now
$140
no data
Value for money
3.54
N11M-GE1
GPU code name
Oland
Laptop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA GeForce 310M  vs  AMD Radeon 520 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Pipelines
320
606 / 625 MHz
Core clock speed
1030 MHz
no data
Transistor count
1,040 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
4.848
Texture fill rate
20.60
48.96 gflops
Floating-point performance
659.2 gflops
16
CUDA cores
no data
73
Gigaflops
no data
16
Pipelines / CUDA cores
320
260 million
Number of transistors
1,040 million
14 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
50 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA GeForce 310M and AMD Radeon 520 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
None
Supplementary power connectors
None
PCI-E 2.0
Bus support
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA GeForce 310M vs AMD Radeon 520.

GDDR3, DDR3
Memory type
DDR3, GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
2250 MHz
10.67 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
16 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA GeForce 310M vs AMD Radeon 520.

DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
+
Multi monitor support
no data
2048x1536
Maximum VGA resolution
no data
+
HDMI
+

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

+
CUDA
no data
8.0
Power management
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA GeForce 310M and AMD Radeon 520 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
DirectX 12, Shader 5.0
3.3
OpenGL
no data
N/A
Vulkan
+
4.1
Shader Model
no data
1.1
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce 310M and AMD Radeon 520 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce 310M or AMD Radeon 520 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 310M
AMD Radeon 520
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 310M
AMD Radeon 520
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 310M
AMD Radeon 520
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 310M
AMD Radeon 520
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 310M
AMD Radeon 520
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 310M

There is no accountable advantage

Advantages of AMD Radeon 520

2.64% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($140 vs $163)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

More memory bandwidth (16 GB/s vs 10.67 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA GeForce 310M or AMD Radeon 520?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon 520 .

NVIDIA GeForce 310M versus AMD Radeon 520 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Ice Storm GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Ice Storm GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

77543 (100 %)

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

8413 (100 %)

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

1233 (100 %)

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

1319 (100 %)

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

2017 (100 %)

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

5266 (100 %)

Unigine Heaven 3.0

Benchmark Unigine Heaven 3.0: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Unigine Heaven 3.0 test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.2 Out of 77 Hitesti Score
3.3 Out of 76 Hitesti Score