ATI Radeon HD 4350
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
ATI Radeon HD 4350
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between ATI Radeon HD 4350  vs  GeForce GTX 260 Core 216.

not rated
Place in performance rating
not rated
Terascale 1
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
30 September 2008 (13 years ago)
Release date
16 September 2008 (13 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$299
$53
Price now
$260 (0.9x MSRP)
RV710
GPU code name
GT200
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between ATI Radeon HD 4350  vs  GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

600 MHz
Core clock speed
576 MHz
55 nm
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
4.800
Texture fill rate
41.47
96 gflops
Floating-point performance
536.5 gflops
80
Pipelines / CUDA cores
216
242 million
Number of transistors
1,400 million
20 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
182 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards ATI Radeon HD 4350 and GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
267 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between ATI Radeon HD 4350 vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216.

DDR2
Memory type
GDDR3
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
448 Bit
500 MHz
Memory clock speed
1998 MHz
6.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
111.9 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between ATI Radeon HD 4350 vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216.

2x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
CUDA
1.3

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders ATI Radeon HD 4350 and GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

no data
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
no data
OpenGL
3.3
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
Shader Model
4.0
no data
OpenCL
1.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for ATI Radeon HD 4350 and GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the ATI Radeon HD 4350 or GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) ATI Radeon HD 4350
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Death Stranding (2020) ATI Radeon HD 4350
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
F1 2020 (2020) ATI Radeon HD 4350
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Gears Tactics (2020) ATI Radeon HD 4350
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Doom Eternal (2020) ATI Radeon HD 4350
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of ATI Radeon HD 4350

2% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($53 vs $260 (0.9x MSRP))

Finer manufacturing process technology (55 nm vs 65 nm)

Advantages of GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

More maximum RAM amount (896 MB vs 512 MB)

More memory bandwidth (111.9 GB/s vs 6.4 GB/s)

So, ATI Radeon HD 4350 or GeForce GTX 260 Core 216?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend ATI Radeon HD 4350 .

ATI Radeon HD 4350 versus GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

2.9 Out of 57 Hitesti Score
4.4 Out of 5 Hitesti Score