ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
VS
Radeon X1650 PRO AGP
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
VS
Radeon X1650 PRO AGP

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO  vs  Radeon X1650 PRO AGP.

1022
Place in performance rating
not rated
TeraScale
Architecture
R500
28 June 2007 (14 years ago)
Release date
15 October 2006 (15 years ago)
$130
Price now
$200
0.01
Value for money
no data
RV630
GPU code name
RV535
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO  vs  Radeon X1650 PRO AGP in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

600 MHz
Core clock speed
600 MHz
65 nm
Manufacturing process technology
80 nm
4.800
Texture fill rate
2.400
144 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
120
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
390 million
Number of transistors
330 million
35 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
44 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and Radeon X1650 PRO AGP come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
AGP 8x
None
Supplementary power connectors
1x Molex

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs Radeon X1650 PRO AGP.

DDR2
Memory type
GDDR3
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
256 MB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1000 MHz
Memory clock speed
1400 MHz
16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
22.4 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs Radeon X1650 PRO AGP.

2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and Radeon X1650 PRO AGP is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

no data
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
no data
OpenGL
2.0
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
Shader Model
3.0
no data
OpenCL
N/A

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and Radeon X1650 PRO AGP graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO or Radeon X1650 PRO AGP good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Radeon X1650 PRO AGP
Death Stranding (2020) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Radeon X1650 PRO AGP
F1 2020 (2020) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Radeon X1650 PRO AGP
Gears Tactics (2020) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Radeon X1650 PRO AGP
Doom Eternal (2020) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Radeon X1650 PRO AGP
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

1.79% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($130 vs $200)

Finer manufacturing process technology (65 nm vs 80 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 256 MB)

Advantages of Radeon X1650 PRO AGP

More memory bandwidth (22.4 GB/s vs 16 GB/s)

So, ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO or Radeon X1650 PRO AGP?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO .

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO versus Radeon X1650 PRO AGP performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.7 Out of 57 Hitesti Score
4.0 Out of 6 Hitesti Score