ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GT 220.

1022
Place in performance rating
1028
no data
Value for money (0-100)
5.92
TeraScale
Architecture
GT2xx
no data
Code name
GT216
no data
Type
Desktop
28 June 2007 (14 years ago)
Release date
12 October 2009 (12 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$79.99
$130
Price now
$122 (1.5x MSRP)
0.01
Value for money
0.01
RV630
GPU code name
GT216
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Pipelines
48
600 MHz
Core clock speed
625 MHz
no data
Transistor count
486 million
65 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
58 Watt
4.800
Texture fill rate
9.840
144 gflops
Floating-point performance
144 gflops
no data
Maximum GPU temperature
105 °C
no data
CUDA cores
48
120
Pipelines / CUDA cores
48
390 million
Number of transistors
486 million
35 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
58 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
6.6" (16.8 cm)
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data
no data
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
no data
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220.

DDR2
Memory type
GDDR3
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1000 MHz
Memory clock speed
790 MHz
16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
25.3 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220.

2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
VGADVIHDMI
no data
Multi monitor support
+
no data
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
no data
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF + HDA
no data
HDMI
+

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
CUDA
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

no data
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
no data
OpenGL
3.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO or NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
Death Stranding (2020) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
F1 2020 (2020) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
Gears Tactics (2020) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
Doom Eternal (2020) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 1 GB)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220

0.17% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($122 (1.5x MSRP) vs $130)

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 65 nm)

More memory bandwidth (25.3 GB/s vs 16 GB/s)

So, ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO or NVIDIA GeForce GT 220?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 .

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.7 Out of 57 Hitesti Score
3.4 Out of 55 Hitesti Score