General info
The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile.
Technical specs
Which GPU is better between AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Radeon R9 280 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.
Memory
Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile.
Video outputs and ports
Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile.
Technologies
Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.
API support
The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Radeon R9 280 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests.
Gaming performance
Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R9 280 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R9 280 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile good for gaming.
|
low
1280x720 |
med.
1920x1080 |
high
1920x1080 |
ultra
1920x1080 |
QHD
2560x1440 |
4K
3840x2160 |
||
| Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | AMD Radeon R9 280 | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | |||||||
| Death Stranding (2020) | AMD Radeon R9 280 | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | |||||||
| F1 2020 (2020) | AMD Radeon R9 280 | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | |||||||
| Gears Tactics (2020) | AMD Radeon R9 280 | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | 100 | 67.3 | 49.8 | 29.3 | 16.9 | ||
| Doom Eternal (2020) | AMD Radeon R9 280 | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | 149.5 | 90.7 | 66.6 | ||||
| Legend | |
| 5 | Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps |
| May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected. | |
| 30 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps |
| 40 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps |
| 60 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps |
| May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected. | |
| ? | Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene. |
| Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family. | |
| The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results. | |
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
Cheaper ($305 (1.1x MSRP) vs $892)
More pipelines (1792 vs 1024)
More memory bandwidth (240 GB/s vs 192.0 GB/s)
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
10.39% faster in synthetic tests
Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 28 nm)
Less power consumption (50 Watt vs 200 Watt)
More maximum RAM amount (4 GB vs 3 GB)
So, AMD Radeon R9 280 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile .
AMD Radeon R9 280 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile performance benchmarks comparison
Benchmark 3DMark Ice Storm GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Ice Storm GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
User rating
