AMD FirePro V3900
VS
HD Graphics (Skylake)
AMD FirePro V3900
VS
HD Graphics (Skylake)

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD FirePro V3900  vs  HD Graphics (Skylake).

777
Place in performance rating
not rated
6.37
Value for money (0-100)
no data
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Gen. 9 Skylake
Turks
Code name
no data
Workstation
Type
no data
7 February 2012 (9 years ago)
Release date
1 September 2015 (6 years ago)
$118
Price now
$390
0.36
Value for money
no data
Turks
GPU code name
Skylake GT1
Workstation
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD FirePro V3900  vs  HD Graphics (Skylake) in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

480
Pipelines
no data
650 MHz
Core clock speed
300 MHz
716 million
Transistor count
no data
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
199 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
15.60
Texture fill rate
no data
624.0 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
480
Pipelines / CUDA cores
12
no data
Boost clock speed
800 MHz
716 million
Number of transistors
no data
199 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD FirePro V3900 and HD Graphics (Skylake) come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
no data
168 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data
PCIe 2.1 x16
Bus support
no data
half height / half length
Form factor
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD FirePro V3900 vs HD Graphics (Skylake).

GDDR3
Memory type
no data
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
128 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
1800 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
28 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD FirePro V3900 vs HD Graphics (Skylake).

1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
no data
1
Dual-link DVI support
no data
1
HD сomponent video output
no data
1
DisplayPort count
no data

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
Quick Sync
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD FirePro V3900 and HD Graphics (Skylake) is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
DirectX 12_1
4.4
OpenGL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD FirePro V3900 and HD Graphics (Skylake) graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD FirePro V3900 or HD Graphics (Skylake) good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD FirePro V3900
HD Graphics (Skylake)
Death Stranding (2020) AMD FirePro V3900
HD Graphics (Skylake)
F1 2020 (2020) AMD FirePro V3900
HD Graphics (Skylake)
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD FirePro V3900
HD Graphics (Skylake)
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD FirePro V3900
HD Graphics (Skylake)
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD FirePro V3900

4.27% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($118 vs $390)

Advantages of HD Graphics (Skylake)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 40 nm)

So, AMD FirePro V3900 or HD Graphics (Skylake)?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD FirePro V3900 .

AMD FirePro V3900 versus HD Graphics (Skylake) performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

4.4 Out of 18 Hitesti Score
1.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score