AMD Cayman
VS
AMD FirePro V3900
AMD Cayman
VS
AMD FirePro V3900

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Cayman  vs  AMD FirePro V3900.

not rated
Place in performance rating
777
no data
Value for money (0-100)
6.37
TeraScale 3
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Cayman
Code name
Turks
Desktop
Type
Workstation
no data
Release date
7 February 2012 (9 years ago)
$17.44
Price now
$118
no data
Value for money
0.36
Cayman
GPU code name
Turks
Desktop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Cayman  vs  AMD FirePro V3900 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

1536
Pipelines
480
no data
Core clock speed
650 MHz
2,640 million
Transistor count
716 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
199 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
15.60
no data
Floating-point performance
624.0 gflops
1536
Pipelines / CUDA cores
480
2,640 million
Number of transistors
716 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
199 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Cayman and AMD FirePro V3900 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
168 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Bus support
PCIe 2.1 x16
no data
Form factor
half height / half length

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Cayman vs AMD FirePro V3900.

no data
Memory type
GDDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
no data
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
28 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Cayman vs AMD FirePro V3900.

no data
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
no data
Dual-link DVI support
1
no data
HD сomponent video output
1
no data
DisplayPort count
1

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Cayman and AMD FirePro V3900 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Cayman and AMD FirePro V3900 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Cayman or AMD FirePro V3900 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cayman
AMD FirePro V3900
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cayman
AMD FirePro V3900
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cayman
AMD FirePro V3900
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cayman
AMD FirePro V3900
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cayman
AMD FirePro V3900
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cayman

Cheaper ($17.44 vs $118)

More pipelines (1536 vs 480)

Advantages of AMD FirePro V3900

3.25% faster in synthetic tests

So, AMD Cayman or AMD FirePro V3900?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD FirePro V3900 .

AMD Cayman versus AMD FirePro V3900 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score
4.4 Out of 18 Hitesti Score