AMD Cedar
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
AMD Cedar
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Cedar  vs  NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M.

not rated
Place in performance rating
855
no data
Value for money (0-100)
0.66
TeraScale 2
Architecture
G9x
Cedar
Code name
G92
Desktop
Type
Mobile workstation
no data
Release date
14 August 2008 (13 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$925
$17.81
Price now
$163 (0.2x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
0.13
Cedar
GPU code name
NB9E-GLM3
Desktop
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Cedar  vs  NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

80
Pipelines
128
no data
Core clock speed
550 MHz
292 million
Transistor count
754 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
35.20
no data
Floating-point performance
352.0 gflops
80
Pipelines / CUDA cores
128
292 million
Number of transistors
754 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
75 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
MXM-HE
no data
Laptop size
large

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Cedar vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M.

no data
Memory type
GDDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
no data
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
51.2 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Cedar vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
CUDA
+
no data
PowerMizer 8.0
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Cedar or NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cedar

Cheaper ($17.81 vs $163 (0.2x MSRP))

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 65 nm)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

3.49% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (128 vs 80)

So, AMD Cedar or NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M .

AMD Cedar versus NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 2 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score