AMD Cedar
VS
AMD Radeon R7 260
AMD Cedar
VS
AMD Radeon R7 260

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Cedar  vs  AMD Radeon R7 260.

not rated
Place in performance rating
381
no data
Value for money (0-100)
36.74
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Cedar
Code name
Bonaire
Desktop
Type
Desktop
no data
Release date
17 December 2013 (7 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$109
$17.81
Price now
$159 (1.5x MSRP)
no data
Design
reference
no data
Value for money
4.76
Cedar
GPU code name
Bonaire
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Cedar  vs  AMD Radeon R7 260 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

80
Pipelines
768
no data
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
292 million
Transistor count
2,080 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
115 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
48.00
no data
Floating-point performance
1,536 gflops
80
Pipelines / CUDA cores
768
no data
Boost clock speed
1100 MHz
292 million
Number of transistors
2,080 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
115 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Cedar and AMD Radeon R7 260 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Length
170 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1 x 6-pin
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Cedar vs AMD Radeon R7 260.

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
no data
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1625 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
104 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Cedar vs AMD Radeon R7 260.

no data
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
no data
Eyefinity
1
no data
HDMI
+
no data
DisplayPort support
+

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
AppAcceleration
-
no data
FreeSync
1
no data
HD3D
-
no data
PowerTune
-
no data
TrueAudio
-
no data
ZeroCore
-
no data
DDMA audio
+
no data
Enduro
-

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Cedar and AMD Radeon R7 260 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
DirectX® 12
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Shader Model
6.3
no data
OpenCL
2.0
no data
Mantle
-

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Cedar and AMD Radeon R7 260 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Cedar or AMD Radeon R7 260 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon R7 260
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon R7 260
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon R7 260
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon R7 260
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon R7 260
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cedar

Cheaper ($17.81 vs $159 (1.5x MSRP))

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260

14.39% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (768 vs 80)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

So, AMD Cedar or AMD Radeon R7 260?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R7 260 .

AMD Cedar versus AMD Radeon R7 260 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 2 Hitesti Score
3.0 Out of 4 Hitesti Score