NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
VS
AMD FirePro M2000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
VS
AMD FirePro M2000

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M  vs  AMD FirePro M2000.

959
Place in performance rating
915
3.50
Value for money (0-100)
no data
G7x
Architecture
Terascale 2
G71
Code name
Turks
Mobile workstation
Type
Mobile workstation
1 March 2007 (14 years ago)
Release date
1 July 2012 (9 years ago)
$99.99
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$69 (0.7x MSRP)
Price now
$387
0.11
Value for money
0.03
G71GLM
GPU code name
Turks GLM
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M  vs  AMD FirePro M2000 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

32
Pipelines
480
8 MHz
Core clock speed
500 MHz
575 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
278 million
Transistor count
716 million
90 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
45 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
13.80
Texture fill rate
12.00
no data
Floating-point performance
480.0 gflops
32
Pipelines / CUDA cores
480
575 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
278 million
Number of transistors
716 million
45 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
33 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M and AMD FirePro M2000 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

MXM-III
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
large
Laptop size
medium sized
no data
Bus support
n/a
no data
Form factor
chip-down

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M vs AMD FirePro M2000.

GDDR3
Memory type
GDDR5
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
1200 MHz
Memory clock speed
3200 MHz
38.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
25.6 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M vs AMD FirePro M2000.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs
no data
StereoOutput3D
1

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M and AMD FirePro M2000 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M and AMD FirePro M2000 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M or AMD FirePro M2000 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
AMD FirePro M2000
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
AMD FirePro M2000
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
AMD FirePro M2000
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
AMD FirePro M2000
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
AMD FirePro M2000
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

Cheaper ($69 (0.7x MSRP) vs $387)

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 1 GB)

More memory bandwidth (38.4 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s)

Advantages of AMD FirePro M2000

0.16% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (480 vs 32)

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 90 nm)

Less power consumption (33 Watt vs 45 Watt)

So, NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M or AMD FirePro M2000?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD FirePro M2000 .

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M versus AMD FirePro M2000 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
2.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score