NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q  vs  NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M.

285
Place in performance rating
959
no data
Value for money (0-100)
3.50
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
G7x
GM204
Code name
G71
Workstation
Type
Mobile workstation
30 August 2015 (6 years ago)
Release date
1 March 2007 (14 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$99.99
no data
Price now
$69 (0.7x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
0.11
GM204
GPU code name
G71GLM
Workstation
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q  vs  NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

2048
Pipelines
32
557 MHz
Core clock speed
8 MHz
1178 MHz
Boost Clock
575 MHz
5,200 million
Transistor count
278 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
90 nm
225 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
150.8
Texture fill rate
13.80
4,833 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
2048
Pipelines / CUDA cores
32
1178 MHz
Boost clock speed
575 MHz
5,200 million
Number of transistors
278 million
225 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
45 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
MXM-III
267 mm
Length
no data
1x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
no data
no data
Laptop size
large

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR3
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
5012 MHz
Memory clock speed
1200 MHz
160.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
38.4 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q or NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q

23.08% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (2048 vs 32)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 90 nm)

More memory bandwidth (160.4 GB/s vs 38.4 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

Less power consumption (45 Watt vs 225 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 2 GB)

So, NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q or NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q .

NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q versus NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score