NVIDIA TITAN V
VS
NVIDIA NVS 315
NVIDIA TITAN V
VS
NVIDIA NVS 315

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定NVIDIA TITAN V和NVIDIA NVS 315之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

34
业绩排名中的位置
939
4.91
物有所值
没有数据
Volta
建筑学
Fermi 2.0
GV100
代码名称
GF119
Desktop
类型
Desktop
7 December 2017 (3 years ago)
发布日期
10 March 2013 (8 years ago)
$2,999
初始价格
$159
$1234 (0.4x MSRP)
当前价格
$343 (2.2x MSRP)
21.29
物有所值
0.03
GV100
图形处理器的代码名称
GF119
Desktop
市场部分
Workstation

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,NVIDIA TITAN V 与 NVIDIA NVS 315 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

5120
输送机
48
1200 MHz
核心时钟频率
523 MHz
1455 MHz
加速
没有数据
21,100 million
晶体管的数量
292 million
12 nm
技术过程
40 nm
250 Watt
消耗功率
19 Watt
465.6
每秒处理的文本数
4.184
14,899 gflops
浮点运算
100.4 gflops
5120
转换器/CUDA核心
48
1455 MHz
加速速度
没有数据
21,100 million
晶体管的数量
292 million
250 Watt
设计热量输出
19 Watt

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA TITAN V}和NVIDIA NVS 315}}}}}}的图形卡NVIDIA TITAN V}。

PCIe 3.0 x16
介面
PCIe 2.0 x16
267 mm
长度
145 mm
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
补充喂养
None

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. NVIDIA TITAN V 和NVIDIA NVS 315 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

HBM2
存储器类型
DDR3
12 GB
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
3072 Bit
存储器总线容量
64 Bit
1696 MHz
存储器频率
1750 MHz
651.3 GB/s
内存带宽
14 GB/s

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA TITAN V和NVIDIA NVS 315的图形卡NVIDIA TITAN V。

1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
与显示器的连接
1x DMS-59
+
HDMI
没有数据

API 支持

两个对手 NVIDIA TITAN V 和 NVIDIA NVS 315 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
+
Vulkan
没有数据

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 NVIDIA TITAN V 和 NVIDIA NVS 315 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 NVIDIA TITAN V 查明是否 NVIDIA NVS 315 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA TITAN V
NVIDIA NVS 315
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA TITAN V
NVIDIA NVS 315
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA TITAN V
NVIDIA NVS 315
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA TITAN V
NVIDIA NVS 315
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA TITAN V
NVIDIA NVS 315
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 NVIDIA TITAN V

77.86% 在测试中更快

更多输送机 (5120 vs 48)

大的内存带宽 (12 nm vs 40 nm)

最大的RAM尺寸 (12 GB vs 1 GB)

大的内存带宽 (651.3 GB/s vs 14 GB/s)

优势 NVIDIA NVS 315

更加便宜 ($343 (2.2x MSRP) vs $1234 (0.4x MSRP))

更少的电力消耗 (19 Watt vs 250 Watt)

So, NVIDIA TITAN V or NVIDIA NVS 315?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 NVIDIA TITAN V .

NVIDIA TITAN V versus NVIDIA NVS 315 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

Unigine Heaven 4.0

Benchmark Unigine Heaven 4.0。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看Unigine Heaven 4.0的GPU测试结果。

4916 (100 %)

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

17125 (100 %)

用户评价

3.7 Out of 19 Hitesti Score
4.7 Out of 17 Hitesti Score