NVIDIA TITAN V
VS
NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
NVIDIA TITAN V
VS
NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定NVIDIA TITAN V和NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

34
业绩排名中的位置
327
4.91
物有所值
没有数据
Volta
建筑学
Maxwell 2.0
GV100
代码名称
GM204
Desktop
类型
Workstation
7 December 2017 (3 years ago)
发布日期
30 August 2015 (6 years ago)
$2,999
初始价格
没有数据
$1234 (0.4x MSRP)
当前价格
没有数据
21.29
物有所值
没有数据
GV100
图形处理器的代码名称
GM204
Desktop
市场部分
Workstation

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,NVIDIA TITAN V 与 NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

5120
输送机
1536
1200 MHz
核心时钟频率
722 MHz
1455 MHz
加速
没有数据
21,100 million
晶体管的数量
5,200 million
12 nm
技术过程
28 nm
250 Watt
消耗功率
100 Watt
465.6
每秒处理的文本数
69.31
14,899 gflops
浮点运算
2,218 gflops
5120
转换器/CUDA核心
1536
1455 MHz
加速速度
没有数据
21,100 million
晶体管的数量
5,200 million
250 Watt
设计热量输出
100 Watt

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA TITAN V}和NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q}}}}}}的图形卡NVIDIA TITAN V}。

PCIe 3.0 x16
介面
PCIe 3.0 x16
267 mm
长度
没有数据
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
补充喂养
None

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. NVIDIA TITAN V 和NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

HBM2
存储器类型
GDDR5
12 GB
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
3072 Bit
存储器总线容量
256 Bit
1696 MHz
存储器频率
5012 MHz
651.3 GB/s
内存带宽
160.4 GB/s

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA TITAN V和NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q的图形卡NVIDIA TITAN V。

1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
与显示器的连接
No outputs
+
HDMI
没有数据

API 支持

两个对手 NVIDIA TITAN V 和 NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
+
Vulkan
没有数据

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 NVIDIA TITAN V 和 NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 NVIDIA TITAN V 查明是否 NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA TITAN V
NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA TITAN V
NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA TITAN V
NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA TITAN V
NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA TITAN V
NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 NVIDIA TITAN V

62.94% 在测试中更快

更多输送机 (5120 vs 1536)

大的内存带宽 (12 nm vs 28 nm)

最大的RAM尺寸 (12 GB vs 8 GB)

大的内存带宽 (651.3 GB/s vs 160.4 GB/s)

优势 NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q

更少的电力消耗 (100 Watt vs 250 Watt)

So, NVIDIA TITAN V or NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 NVIDIA TITAN V .

NVIDIA TITAN V versus NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

Unigine Heaven 4.0

Benchmark Unigine Heaven 4.0。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看Unigine Heaven 4.0的GPU测试结果。

4916 (100 %)

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

17125 (100 %)

用户评价

3.7 Out of 19 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score