NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
VS
GRID A100A
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
VS
GRID A100A

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M和GRID A100A之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

1048
业绩排名中的位置
not rated
G9x
建筑学
Ampere
1 October 2008 (13 years ago)
发布日期
14 May 2020 (1 year ago)
$69
当前价格
没有数据
0.07
物有所值
没有数据
NB9P-GLM
图形处理器的代码名称
GA100
Mobile workstation
市场部分
Workstation

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 与 GRID A100A 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

625 MHz
核心时钟频率
没有数据
65 nm
技术过程
7 nm
10.00
每秒处理的文本数
434.2
99.2 gflops
浮点运算
没有数据
32
转换器/CUDA核心
6912
没有数据
加速速度
1005 MHz
314 million
晶体管的数量
54,200 million
50 Watt
设计热量输出
400 Watt

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M}和GRID A100A}}}}}}的图形卡NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M}。

MXM-II
介面
PCIe 4.0 x16
没有数据
补充喂养
None
large
Laptop size
没有数据

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 和GRID A100A 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

GDDR3
存储器类型
HBM2e
256 MB
Maximum RAM amount
48 GB
128 Bit
存储器总线容量
6144 Bit
800 MHz
存储器频率
2.4 GB/s
25.6 GB/s
内存带宽
1,866 GB/s
-
共享内存
没有数据

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M和GRID A100A的图形卡NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M。

No outputs
与显示器的连接
No outputs

技术

让我们来看看有什么区别。值得注意的是,NVIDIA和AMD使用的是不同的技术。

没有数据
CUDA
8.0

API 支持

两个对手 NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 和 GRID A100A 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

没有数据
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
没有数据
OpenGL
4.6
没有数据
Vulkan
1.2
没有数据
Shader Model
6.5
没有数据
OpenCL
2.0

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 和 GRID A100A 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 查明是否 GRID A100A 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
GRID A100A
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
GRID A100A
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
GRID A100A
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
GRID A100A
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
GRID A100A
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

2% 在测试中更快

最大的RAM尺寸 (256 MB vs 48 GB)

大的内存带宽 (25.6 GB/s vs 1,866 GB/s)

优势 GRID A100A

大的内存带宽 (7 nm vs 65 nm)

So, NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M or GRID A100A?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M .

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M versus GRID A100A 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

用户评价

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
4.0 Out of 9 Hitesti Score