NVIDIA GRID K1
VS
ATI Radeon HD 3850
NVIDIA GRID K1
VS
ATI Radeon HD 3850

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定NVIDIA GRID K1和ATI Radeon HD 3850之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

711
业绩排名中的位置
907
Kepler
建筑学
TeraScale
GK107
代码名称
RV670
Workstation
类型
Desktop
18 March 2013 (8 years ago)
发布日期
19 November 2007 (14 years ago)
$4,140
初始价格
$179
$340 (0.1x MSRP)
当前价格
$30 (0.2x MSRP)
0.19
物有所值
0.37
GK107
图形处理器的代码名称
RV670
Workstation
市场部分
Desktop

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,NVIDIA GRID K1 与 ATI Radeon HD 3850 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

192
输送机
320
850 MHz
核心时钟频率
668 MHz
1,270 million
晶体管的数量
666 million
28 nm
技术过程
55 nm
130 Watt
消耗功率
75 Watt
13.60
每秒处理的文本数
10.69
4x 326.4 gflops
浮点运算
427.5 gflops
192
转换器/CUDA核心
320
1,270 million
晶体管的数量
666 million
130 Watt
设计热量输出
75 Watt

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA GRID K1}和ATI Radeon HD 3850}}}}}}的图形卡NVIDIA GRID K1}。

PCIe 3.0 x16
介面
PCIe 2.0 x16
267 mm
长度
208 mm
1x 6-pin
补充喂养
1x 6-pin

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. NVIDIA GRID K1 和ATI Radeon HD 3850 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

DDR3
存储器类型
GDDR3
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
128 Bit
存储器总线容量
256 Bit
1782 MHz
存储器频率
1660 MHz
28.51 GB/s
内存带宽
53.12 GB/s

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA GRID K1和ATI Radeon HD 3850的图形卡NVIDIA GRID K1。

No outputs
与显示器的连接
2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API 支持

两个对手 NVIDIA GRID K1 和 ATI Radeon HD 3850 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 NVIDIA GRID K1 和 ATI Radeon HD 3850 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 NVIDIA GRID K1 查明是否 ATI Radeon HD 3850 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GRID K1
ATI Radeon HD 3850
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GRID K1
ATI Radeon HD 3850
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GRID K1
ATI Radeon HD 3850
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GRID K1
ATI Radeon HD 3850
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GRID K1
ATI Radeon HD 3850
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 NVIDIA GRID K1

1.59% 在测试中更快

大的内存带宽 (28 nm vs 55 nm)

最大的RAM尺寸 (4 GB vs 1 GB)

优势 ATI Radeon HD 3850

更加便宜 ($30 (0.2x MSRP) vs $340 (0.1x MSRP))

更多输送机 (320 vs 192)

更少的电力消耗 (75 Watt vs 130 Watt)

大的内存带宽 (53.12 GB/s vs 28.51 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA GRID K1 or ATI Radeon HD 3850?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 NVIDIA GRID K1 .

NVIDIA GRID K1 versus ATI Radeon HD 3850 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

用户评价

5.0 Out of 3 Hitesti Score
4.4 Out of 39 Hitesti Score