ATI Radeon HD 4770
VS
AMD Radeon R9 285
ATI Radeon HD 4770
VS
AMD Radeon R9 285

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定ATI Radeon HD 4770和AMD Radeon R9 285之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

681
业绩排名中的位置
208
没有数据
物有所值
0.05
TeraScale
建筑学
GCN 3.0
RV740
代码名称
Tonga
Desktop
类型
Desktop
28 April 2009 (12 years ago)
发布日期
2 September 2014 (7 years ago)
$109
初始价格
$249
$182 (1.7x MSRP)
当前价格
$385 (1.5x MSRP)
0.35
物有所值
13.04
RV740
图形处理器的代码名称
Tonga
Desktop
市场部分
Desktop

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,ATI Radeon HD 4770 与 AMD Radeon R9 285 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

640
输送机
1792
750 MHz
核心时钟频率
918 MHz
826 million
晶体管的数量
5,000 million
40 nm
技术过程
28 nm
80 Watt
消耗功率
190 Watt
24.00
每秒处理的文本数
102.8
960.0 gflops
浮点运算
3,290 gflops
640
转换器/CUDA核心
1792
826 million
晶体管的数量
5,000 million
80 Watt
设计热量输出
190 Watt

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡ATI Radeon HD 4770}和AMD Radeon R9 285}}}}}}的图形卡ATI Radeon HD 4770}。

PCIe 2.0 x16
介面
PCIe 3.0 x16
203 mm
长度
221 mm
1x 6-pin
补充喂养
2x 6-pin

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. ATI Radeon HD 4770 和AMD Radeon R9 285 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

GDDR5
存储器类型
GDDR5
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
128 Bit
存储器总线容量
256 Bit
3200 MHz
存储器频率
5500 MHz
51.2 GB/s
内存带宽
176.0 GB/s

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡ATI Radeon HD 4770和AMD Radeon R9 285的图形卡ATI Radeon HD 4770。

2x DVI, 1x S-Video
与显示器的连接
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
没有数据
HDMI
+

API 支持

两个对手 ATI Radeon HD 4770 和 AMD Radeon R9 285 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 ATI Radeon HD 4770 和 AMD Radeon R9 285 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 ATI Radeon HD 4770 查明是否 AMD Radeon R9 285 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) ATI Radeon HD 4770
AMD Radeon R9 285
Death Stranding (2020) ATI Radeon HD 4770
AMD Radeon R9 285
F1 2020 (2020) ATI Radeon HD 4770
AMD Radeon R9 285
Gears Tactics (2020) ATI Radeon HD 4770
AMD Radeon R9 285
Doom Eternal (2020) ATI Radeon HD 4770
AMD Radeon R9 285
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 ATI Radeon HD 4770

4.29% 在测试中更快

更加便宜 ($182 (1.7x MSRP) vs $385 (1.5x MSRP))

更少的电力消耗 (80 Watt vs 190 Watt)

最大的RAM尺寸 (512 MB vs 2 GB)

优势 AMD Radeon R9 285

更多输送机 (1792 vs 640)

大的内存带宽 (28 nm vs 40 nm)

大的内存带宽 (176.0 GB/s vs 51.2 GB/s)

So, ATI Radeon HD 4770 or AMD Radeon R9 285?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 ATI Radeon HD 4770 .

ATI Radeon HD 4770 versus AMD Radeon R9 285 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

基准3DMark Fire Strike图形。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看3DMark Fire Strike Graphics的GPU测试结果。

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

用户评价

4.7 Out of 16 Hitesti Score
3.3 Out of 7 Hitesti Score