ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
VS
EGA Wonder 800
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
VS
EGA Wonder 800

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO和EGA Wonder 800之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

1022
业绩排名中的位置
not rated
TeraScale
建筑学
Wonder
28 June 2007 (14 years ago)
发布日期
1 January 1987 (34 years ago)
$130
当前价格
没有数据
0.01
物有所值
没有数据
RV630
图形处理器的代码名称
16899-0
Desktop
市场部分
Desktop

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 与 EGA Wonder 800 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

600 MHz
核心时钟频率
10 MHz
65 nm
技术过程
900 nm
4.800
每秒处理的文本数
没有数据
144 gflops
浮点运算
没有数据
120
转换器/CUDA核心
没有数据
390 million
晶体管的数量
没有数据
35 Watt
设计热量输出
没有数据

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO}和EGA Wonder 800}}}}}}的图形卡ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO}。

PCIe 1.0 x16
介面
PCI
None
补充喂养
没有数据

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 和EGA Wonder 800 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

DDR2
存储器类型
DRAM
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
没有数据
128 Bit
存储器总线容量
32 Bit
1000 MHz
存储器频率
10 MHz
16 GB/s
内存带宽
40 MB/s

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO和EGA Wonder 800的图形卡ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO。

2x DVI, 1x S-Video
与显示器的连接
No outputs

API 支持

两个对手 ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 和 EGA Wonder 800 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

没有数据
DirectX
None
没有数据
OpenGL
None
没有数据
OpenCL
None

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 和 EGA Wonder 800 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 查明是否 EGA Wonder 800 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
EGA Wonder 800
Death Stranding (2020) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
EGA Wonder 800
F1 2020 (2020) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
EGA Wonder 800
Gears Tactics (2020) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
EGA Wonder 800
Doom Eternal (2020) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
EGA Wonder 800
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

1.79% 在测试中更快

大的内存带宽 (65 nm vs 900 nm)

优势 EGA Wonder 800

大的内存带宽 (40 MB/s vs 16 GB/s)

So, ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO or EGA Wonder 800?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO .

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO versus EGA Wonder 800 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

用户评价

3.7 Out of 57 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score