AMD FirePro W6150M
VS
Riva TNT
AMD FirePro W6150M
VS
Riva TNT

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定AMD FirePro W6150M和Riva TNT之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

537
业绩排名中的位置
not rated
GCN 2.0
建筑学
Fahrenheit
12 November 2015 (6 years ago)
发布日期
23 March 1998 (23 years ago)
$299
当前价格
$146
3.30
物有所值
没有数据
Saturn
图形处理器的代码名称
NV4
Workstation
市场部分
Desktop

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,AMD FirePro W6150M 与 Riva TNT 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

1075 MHz
核心时钟频率
90 MHz
28 nm
技术过程
350 nm
51.60
每秒处理的文本数
0.18
1,651 gflops
浮点运算
没有数据
768
转换器/CUDA核心
没有数据
2,080 million
晶体管的数量
7 million

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡AMD FirePro W6150M}和Riva TNT}}}}}}的图形卡AMD FirePro W6150M}。

MXM-B (3.0)
介面
AGP 2x
None
补充喂养
None

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. AMD FirePro W6150M 和Riva TNT 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

GDDR5
存储器类型
SDR
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
16 MB
128 Bit
存储器总线容量
128 Bit
5500 MHz
存储器频率
110 MHz
88 GB/s
内存带宽
1.76 GB/s

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡AMD FirePro W6150M和Riva TNT的图形卡AMD FirePro W6150M。

No outputs
与显示器的连接
1x VGA

API 支持

两个对手 AMD FirePro W6150M 和 Riva TNT 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

没有数据
DirectX
5.0
没有数据
OpenGL
1.2
没有数据
Vulkan
N/A
没有数据
OpenCL
N/A

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 AMD FirePro W6150M 和 Riva TNT 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 AMD FirePro W6150M 查明是否 Riva TNT 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD FirePro W6150M
Riva TNT
Death Stranding (2020) AMD FirePro W6150M
Riva TNT
F1 2020 (2020) AMD FirePro W6150M
Riva TNT
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD FirePro W6150M
Riva TNT
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD FirePro W6150M
Riva TNT
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 AMD FirePro W6150M

6.68% 在测试中更快

大的内存带宽 (28 nm vs 350 nm)

大的内存带宽 (88 GB/s vs 1.76 GB/s)

优势 Riva TNT

更加便宜 ($146 vs $299)

最大的RAM尺寸 (16 MB vs 4 GB)

So, AMD FirePro W6150M or Riva TNT?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 AMD FirePro W6150M .

AMD FirePro W6150M versus Riva TNT 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

用户评价

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
4.5 Out of 8 Hitesti Score