NVIDIA NVS 2100M
VS
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
NVIDIA NVS 2100M
VS
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定NVIDIA NVS 2100M和ATI Mobility FireGL V5700之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

1079
业绩排名中的位置
979
GT2xx
建筑学
RV6xx
没有数据
代码名称
M86
没有数据
类型
Mobile workstation
7 January 2010 (11 years ago)
发布日期
7 January 2008 (13 years ago)
$142
当前价格
没有数据
GT218
图形处理器的代码名称
M86-GL
Mobile workstation
市场部分
Mobile workstation

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,NVIDIA NVS 2100M 与 ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

没有数据
输送机
120
535 MHz
核心时钟频率
600 MHz
没有数据
晶体管的数量
378 million
40 nm
技术过程
55 nm
4.280
每秒处理的文本数
4.800
39.36 gflops
浮点运算
144 gflops
16
转换器/CUDA核心
120
260 million
晶体管的数量
378 million
11 Watt
设计热量输出
没有数据

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA NVS 2100M}和ATI Mobility FireGL V5700}}}}}}的图形卡NVIDIA NVS 2100M}。

PCIe 2.0 x16
介面
PCIe 2.0 x16
没有数据
Laptop size
medium sized

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. NVIDIA NVS 2100M 和ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

GDDR3, DDR3
存储器类型
DDR2/GDDR3/GDDR4
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
64 Bit
存储器总线容量
128 Bit
800 MHz
存储器频率
700 MHz
12.64 GB/s
内存带宽
22.4 GB/s
-
共享内存
-

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA NVS 2100M和ATI Mobility FireGL V5700的图形卡NVIDIA NVS 2100M。

No outputs
与显示器的连接
No outputs

技术

让我们来看看有什么区别。值得注意的是,NVIDIA和AMD使用的是不同的技术。

没有数据
PCI-E 2.0
+

API 支持

两个对手 NVIDIA NVS 2100M 和 ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

没有数据
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
没有数据
OpenGL
3.3

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 NVIDIA NVS 2100M 和 ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 NVIDIA NVS 2100M 查明是否 ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA NVS 2100M
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA NVS 2100M
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA NVS 2100M
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA NVS 2100M
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA NVS 2100M
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 NVIDIA NVS 2100M

大的内存带宽 (40 nm vs 55 nm)

优势 ATI Mobility FireGL V5700

0.48% 在测试中更快

大的内存带宽 (22.4 GB/s vs 12.64 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA NVS 2100M or ATI Mobility FireGL V5700?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 .

NVIDIA NVS 2100M versus ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 基准测试中的比较

3DMark Vantage Performance

基准3DMark Vantage性能。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的3DMark Vantage性能测试结果。

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

用户评价

5.0 Out of 4 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score