Qualcomm Adreno 685
VS
Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
Qualcomm Adreno 685
VS
Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Qualcomm Adreno 685  vs  Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB.

687
Place in performance rating
not rated
no data
Architecture
Volta
6 December 2018 (3 years ago)
Release date
27 March 2018 (3 years ago)
$1429
Price now
$7229
0.58
Value for money
no data
no data
GPU code name
GV100
Laptop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between Qualcomm Adreno 685  vs  Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Core clock speed
1230 MHz
7 nm
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
no data
Texture fill rate
441.6
no data
Floating-point performance
14,131 gflops
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
5120
no data
Boost clock speed
1380 MHz
no data
Number of transistors
21,100 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
250 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards Qualcomm Adreno 685 and Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Supplementary power connectors
2x 8-pin

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB.

no data
Memory type
HBM2
no data
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
no data
Memory bus width
4096 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1752 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
897.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
CUDA
7.0

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders Qualcomm Adreno 685 and Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

DirectX 12
DirectX
12 (12_1)
no data
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.2.131
no data
Shader Model
6.4
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Qualcomm Adreno 685 and Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Qualcomm Adreno 685 or Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
Death Stranding (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
F1 2020 (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
Gears Tactics (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
Doom Eternal (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of Qualcomm Adreno 685

4.32% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($1429 vs $7229)

Finer manufacturing process technology (7 nm vs 12 nm)

Advantages of Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB

There is no accountable advantage

So, Qualcomm Adreno 685 or Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Qualcomm Adreno 685 .

Qualcomm Adreno 685 versus Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.3 Out of 12 Hitesti Score
4.3 Out of 7 Hitesti Score