Qualcomm Adreno 685
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M
Qualcomm Adreno 685
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Qualcomm Adreno 685  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M.

687
Place in performance rating
1034
no data
Architecture
GT2xx
no data
Code name
GT216
no data
Type
Laptop
6 December 2018 (3 years ago)
Release date
15 June 2009 (12 years ago)
$1429
Price now
$57
0.58
Value for money
0.09
no data
GPU code name
N10P-GE
Laptop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between Qualcomm Adreno 685  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Pipelines
48
no data
Core clock speed
500 MHz
no data
Transistor count
486 million
7 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
23 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
8.000
no data
Floating-point performance
105.6 gflops
no data
CUDA cores
48
no data
Gigaflops
158
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
48
no data
Number of transistors
486 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
23 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards Qualcomm Adreno 685 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Laptop size
medium sized
no data
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M.

no data
Memory type
GDDR2, GDDR3
no data
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory bandwidth
16 (DDR2), 25 (DDR3)
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M.

no data
Display Connectors
Dual Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMISingle Link DVI
no data
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
no data
Audio input for HDMI
HDA
no data
HDMI
+

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
CUDA
+
no data
HybridPower
+
no data
Power management
8.0

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders Qualcomm Adreno 685 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

DirectX 12
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
no data
OpenGL
2.1
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
Shader Model
4.1
no data
OpenCL
1.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Qualcomm Adreno 685 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Qualcomm Adreno 685 or NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M
Death Stranding (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M
F1 2020 (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M
Gears Tactics (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M
Doom Eternal (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of Qualcomm Adreno 685

2.28% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (7 nm vs 40 nm)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M

Cheaper ($57 vs $1429)

So, Qualcomm Adreno 685 or NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Qualcomm Adreno 685 .

Qualcomm Adreno 685 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.3 Out of 12 Hitesti Score
3.0 Out of 2 Hitesti Score