General info
The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs RSX-CXD2953.
Technical specs
Which GPU is better between Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs RSX-CXD2953 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.
API support
The confrontation between the two contenders Qualcomm Adreno 685 and RSX-CXD2953 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests.
Gaming performance
Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Qualcomm Adreno 685 and RSX-CXD2953 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Qualcomm Adreno 685 or RSX-CXD2953 good for gaming.
|
low
1280x720 |
med.
1920x1080 |
high
1920x1080 |
ultra
1920x1080 |
QHD
2560x1440 |
4K
3840x2160 |
||
| Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | Qualcomm Adreno 685 | ||||||
| RSX-CXD2953 | |||||||
| Death Stranding (2020) | Qualcomm Adreno 685 | ||||||
| RSX-CXD2953 | |||||||
| F1 2020 (2020) | Qualcomm Adreno 685 | ||||||
| RSX-CXD2953 | |||||||
| Gears Tactics (2020) | Qualcomm Adreno 685 | ||||||
| RSX-CXD2953 | |||||||
| Doom Eternal (2020) | Qualcomm Adreno 685 | ||||||
| RSX-CXD2953 | |||||||
| Legend | |
| 5 | Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps |
| May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected. | |
| 30 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps |
| 40 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps |
| 60 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps |
| May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected. | |
| ? | Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene. |
| Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family. | |
| The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results. | |
Advantages of Qualcomm Adreno 685
4.32% faster in synthetic tests
Finer manufacturing process technology (7 nm vs 90 nm)
Advantages of RSX-CXD2953
So, Qualcomm Adreno 685 or RSX-CXD2953?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Qualcomm Adreno 685 .
Qualcomm Adreno 685 versus RSX-CXD2953 performance benchmarks comparison
Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
User rating
