Qualcomm Adreno 685
VS
Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16
Qualcomm Adreno 685
VS
Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Qualcomm Adreno 685  vs  Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16.

687
Place in performance rating
not rated
no data
Architecture
Fahrenheit
6 December 2018 (3 years ago)
Release date
22 March 1999 (22 years ago)
$1429
Price now
no data
0.58
Value for money
no data
no data
GPU code name
NV5 B6
Laptop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between Qualcomm Adreno 685  vs  Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Core clock speed
100 MHz
7 nm
Manufacturing process technology
250 nm
no data
Texture fill rate
0.2
no data
Number of transistors
15 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards Qualcomm Adreno 685 and Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
AGP 4x
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16.

no data
Memory type
SDR
no data
Maximum RAM amount
16 MB
no data
Memory bus width
64 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
133 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
1.064 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16.

no data
Display Connectors
1x VGA

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders Qualcomm Adreno 685 and Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

DirectX 12
DirectX
6.0
no data
OpenGL
1.2
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
OpenCL
N/A

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Qualcomm Adreno 685 and Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Qualcomm Adreno 685 or Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16
Death Stranding (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16
F1 2020 (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16
Gears Tactics (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16
Doom Eternal (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of Qualcomm Adreno 685

4.32% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (7 nm vs 250 nm)

Advantages of Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16

There is no accountable advantage

So, Qualcomm Adreno 685 or Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Qualcomm Adreno 685 .

Qualcomm Adreno 685 versus Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.3 Out of 12 Hitesti Score
4.4 Out of 7 Hitesti Score