Qualcomm Adreno 685
VS
Matrox Mystique G200
Qualcomm Adreno 685
VS
Matrox Mystique G200

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Qualcomm Adreno 685  vs  Matrox Mystique G200.

687
Place in performance rating
not rated
no data
Architecture
G200
6 December 2018 (3 years ago)
Release date
1998 (23 years ago)
$1429
Price now
no data
0.58
Value for money
no data
no data
GPU code name
Eclipse
Laptop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between Qualcomm Adreno 685  vs  Matrox Mystique G200 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Core clock speed
84 MHz
7 nm
Manufacturing process technology
350 nm
no data
Texture fill rate
0.08
no data
Number of transistors
10 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards Qualcomm Adreno 685 and Matrox Mystique G200 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
AGP 2x
no data
Length
150 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs Matrox Mystique G200.

no data
Memory type
SDR
no data
Maximum RAM amount
8 MB
no data
Memory bus width
64 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
112 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
896.0 MB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs Matrox Mystique G200.

no data
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x VGA

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders Qualcomm Adreno 685 and Matrox Mystique G200 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

DirectX 12
DirectX
5.0
no data
OpenGL
None
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
OpenCL
None

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Qualcomm Adreno 685 and Matrox Mystique G200 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Qualcomm Adreno 685 or Matrox Mystique G200 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
Matrox Mystique G200
Death Stranding (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
Matrox Mystique G200
F1 2020 (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
Matrox Mystique G200
Gears Tactics (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
Matrox Mystique G200
Doom Eternal (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
Matrox Mystique G200
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of Qualcomm Adreno 685

4.32% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (7 nm vs 350 nm)

Advantages of Matrox Mystique G200

There is no accountable advantage

So, Qualcomm Adreno 685 or Matrox Mystique G200?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Qualcomm Adreno 685 .

Qualcomm Adreno 685 versus Matrox Mystique G200 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.3 Out of 12 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score