Qualcomm Adreno 685
VS
FireGL V8650
Qualcomm Adreno 685
VS
FireGL V8650

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Qualcomm Adreno 685  vs  FireGL V8650.

687
Place in performance rating
not rated
no data
Architecture
TeraScale
6 December 2018 (3 years ago)
Release date
14 May 2007 (14 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$2,799
$1429
Price now
$149 (0.1x MSRP)
0.58
Value for money
no data
no data
GPU code name
R600
Laptop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between Qualcomm Adreno 685  vs  FireGL V8650 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Core clock speed
688 MHz
7 nm
Manufacturing process technology
80 nm
no data
Texture fill rate
11.01
no data
Floating-point performance
440.3 gflops
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
320
no data
Number of transistors
720 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards Qualcomm Adreno 685 and FireGL V8650 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
no data
Length
254 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs FireGL V8650.

no data
Memory type
GDDR4
no data
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
no data
Memory bus width
512 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1736 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
111.1 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs FireGL V8650.

no data
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders Qualcomm Adreno 685 and FireGL V8650 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

DirectX 12
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
no data
OpenGL
3.3
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
Shader Model
4.0
no data
OpenCL
N/A

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Qualcomm Adreno 685 and FireGL V8650 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Qualcomm Adreno 685 or FireGL V8650 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
FireGL V8650
Death Stranding (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
FireGL V8650
F1 2020 (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
FireGL V8650
Gears Tactics (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
FireGL V8650
Doom Eternal (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
FireGL V8650
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of Qualcomm Adreno 685

4.32% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (7 nm vs 80 nm)

Advantages of FireGL V8650

Cheaper ($149 (0.1x MSRP) vs $1429)

So, Qualcomm Adreno 685 or FireGL V8650?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Qualcomm Adreno 685 .

Qualcomm Adreno 685 versus FireGL V8650 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.3 Out of 12 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score