NVIDIA Tesla M2090
VS
AMD FirePro W5000
NVIDIA Tesla M2090
VS
AMD FirePro W5000

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Tesla M2090  vs  AMD FirePro W5000.

not rated
Place in performance rating
376
no data
Value for money (0-100)
9.44
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GF110
Code name
Pitcairn
Workstation
Type
Workstation
25 July 2011 (10 years ago)
Release date
7 August 2012 (9 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$599
$172
Price now
$187 (0.3x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
5.50
GF110
GPU code name
Pitcairn
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Tesla M2090  vs  AMD FirePro W5000 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

512
Pipelines
768
651 MHz
Core clock speed
825 MHz
3,000 million
Transistor count
2,800 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
250 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
41.66
Texture fill rate
39.60
1,331.2 gflops
Floating-point performance
1,267 gflops
512
Pipelines / CUDA cores
768
3,000 million
Number of transistors
2,800 million
250 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
350 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Tesla M2090 and AMD FirePro W5000 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
248 mm
Length
183 mm
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
no data
Form factor
full height / half length

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs AMD FirePro W5000.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
6 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
384 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
3696 MHz
Memory clock speed
3200 MHz
177.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
102.4 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs AMD FirePro W5000.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
no data
Dual-link DVI support
1
no data
DisplayPort count
2

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Tesla M2090 and AMD FirePro W5000 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Tesla M2090 and AMD FirePro W5000 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Tesla M2090 or AMD FirePro W5000 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Tesla M2090
AMD FirePro W5000
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Tesla M2090
AMD FirePro W5000
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Tesla M2090
AMD FirePro W5000
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Tesla M2090
AMD FirePro W5000
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Tesla M2090
AMD FirePro W5000
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Tesla M2090

35.08% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($172 vs $187 (0.3x MSRP))

More maximum RAM amount (6 GB vs 2 GB)

More memory bandwidth (177.4 GB/s vs 102.4 GB/s)

Advantages of AMD FirePro W5000

More pipelines (768 vs 512)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

Less power consumption (75 Watt vs 250 Watt)

So, NVIDIA Tesla M2090 or AMD FirePro W5000?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Tesla M2090 .

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 versus AMD FirePro W5000 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 7 Hitesti Score
4.4 Out of 9 Hitesti Score