NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
VS
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
VS
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M  vs  ATI Mobility FireGL V5700.

1056
Place in performance rating
979
G8x
Architecture
RV6xx
no data
Code name
M86
no data
Type
Mobile workstation
9 June 2007 (14 years ago)
Release date
7 January 2008 (13 years ago)
$66
Price now
no data
0.06
Value for money
no data
G84M
GPU code name
M86-GL
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M  vs  ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Pipelines
120
575 MHz
Core clock speed
600 MHz
no data
Transistor count
378 million
80 nm
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
9.200
Texture fill rate
4.800
73.6 gflops
Floating-point performance
144 gflops
32
Pipelines / CUDA cores
120
289 million
Number of transistors
378 million
20 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M and ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

MXM-HE
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
large
Laptop size
medium sized

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5700.

GDDR3, GDDR2
Memory type
DDR2/GDDR3/GDDR4
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
700 MHz
Memory clock speed
700 MHz
22.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
22.4 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5700.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
PCI-E 2.0
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M and ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

no data
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
no data
OpenGL
3.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M and ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M or ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

There is no accountable advantage

Advantages of ATI Mobility FireGL V5700

0.4% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (55 nm vs 80 nm)

So, NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M or ATI Mobility FireGL V5700?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 .

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M versus ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 performance benchmarks comparison

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score