NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI.

1016
Place in performance rating
382
2.30
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
G86
Code name
N14P-GT
Workstation
Type
Laptop
4 October 2007 (14 years ago)
Release date
1 April 2013 (8 years ago)
$149
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$107 (0.7x MSRP)
Price now
$545
0.02
Value for money
1.21
G86
GPU code name
N14P-GT
Workstation
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

16
Pipelines
768
459 MHz
Core clock speed
967 MHz
210 million
Transistor count
1300 Million
80 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
21 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
3.672
Texture fill rate
no data
29.376 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
16
Pipelines / CUDA cores
768
210 million
Number of transistors
1300 Million
21 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
no data
168 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data
no data
Laptop size
large

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI.

DDR2
Memory type
DDR3, GDDR5
256 MB
Maximum RAM amount
2x 2 GB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
2x 128 Bit
800 MHz
Memory clock speed
2000 - 5000 MHz
6.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI.

1x DMS-59
Display Connectors
no data

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
GPU Boost
+
no data
CUDA
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
3.3
OpenGL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 or NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

Cheaper ($107 (0.7x MSRP) vs $545)

More maximum RAM amount (256 MB vs 2x 2 GB)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI

13.54% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (768 vs 16)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 80 nm)

So, NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 or NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI .

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Unigine Heaven 3.0

Benchmark Unigine Heaven 3.0: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Unigine Heaven 3.0 test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

2.5 Out of 2 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 2 Hitesti Score