NVIDIA Quadro K4200
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500
NVIDIA Quadro K4200
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro K4200  vs  NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500.

284
Place in performance rating
956
20.19
Value for money (0-100)
5.26
Kepler
Architecture
Curie
GK104
Code name
G71
Workstation
Type
Workstation
22 July 2014 (7 years ago)
Release date
22 May 2006 (15 years ago)
$854.99
Launch price (MSRP)
$1,599
$383 (0.4x MSRP)
Price now
$228 (0.1x MSRP)
7.44
Value for money
0.03
GK104
GPU code name
G71
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro K4200  vs  NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

1344
Pipelines
no data
771 MHz
Core clock speed
450 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
3,540 million
Transistor count
278 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
90 nm
108 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
80 Watt
87.81
Texture fill rate
9.000
2,107 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
1344
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
784 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
3,540 million
Number of transistors
278 million
108 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
80 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro K4200 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
241 mm
Length
173 mm
1x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR3
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
256 MB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
5400 MHz
Memory clock speed
1320 MHz
172.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
42.24 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500.

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro K4200 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
+
Vulkan
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro K4200 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro K4200 or NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K4200
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K4200
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K4200
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K4200
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K4200
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K4200

18.15% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 90 nm)

More memory bandwidth (172.8 GB/s vs 42.24 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500

Cheaper ($228 (0.1x MSRP) vs $383 (0.4x MSRP))

Less power consumption (80 Watt vs 108 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (256 MB vs 4 GB)

So, NVIDIA Quadro K4200 or NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro K4200 .

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 versus NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Octane Render OctaneBench

Benchmark Octane Render OctaneBench: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Octane Render OctaneBench test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

4.2 Out of 18 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score