NVIDIA Quadro K4200
VS
AMD FirePro S7000
NVIDIA Quadro K4200
VS
AMD FirePro S7000

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro K4200  vs  AMD FirePro S7000.

284
Place in performance rating
291
20.19
Value for money (0-100)
50.16
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GK104
Code name
Pitcairn
Workstation
Type
Workstation
22 July 2014 (7 years ago)
Release date
27 August 2012 (9 years ago)
$854.99
Launch price (MSRP)
$1,249
$383 (0.4x MSRP)
Price now
$149 (0.1x MSRP)
7.44
Value for money
13.45
GK104
GPU code name
Pitcairn
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro K4200  vs  AMD FirePro S7000 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

1344
Pipelines
1280
771 MHz
Core clock speed
950 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
3,540 million
Transistor count
2,800 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
108 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
350 Watt
87.81
Texture fill rate
76.00
2,107 gflops
Floating-point performance
2,432 gflops
1344
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1280
784 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
3,540 million
Number of transistors
2,800 million
108 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
350 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro K4200 and AMD FirePro S7000 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
241 mm
Length
292 mm
1x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
no data
Form factor
full height / full length

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs AMD FirePro S7000.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
5400 MHz
Memory clock speed
4800 MHz
172.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
153.6 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs AMD FirePro S7000.

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort
no data
Dual-link DVI support
1
no data
DisplayPort count
1

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro K4200 and AMD FirePro S7000 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
+
Vulkan
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro K4200 and AMD FirePro S7000 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro K4200 or AMD FirePro S7000 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K4200
AMD FirePro S7000
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K4200
AMD FirePro S7000
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K4200
AMD FirePro S7000
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K4200
AMD FirePro S7000
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K4200
AMD FirePro S7000
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K4200

0.33% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (1344 vs 1280)

Less power consumption (108 Watt vs 350 Watt)

More memory bandwidth (172.8 GB/s vs 153.6 GB/s)

Advantages of AMD FirePro S7000

Cheaper ($149 (0.1x MSRP) vs $383 (0.4x MSRP))

So, NVIDIA Quadro K4200 or AMD FirePro S7000?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro K4200 .

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 versus AMD FirePro S7000 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Octane Render OctaneBench

Benchmark Octane Render OctaneBench: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Octane Render OctaneBench test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

4.2 Out of 18 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score