NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
VS
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
VS
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro K2200M  vs  AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100.

311
Place in performance rating
316
35.26
Value for money (0-100)
15.40
Maxwell
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GM107
Code name
Baffin
Workstation
Type
Workstation
19 July 2014 (7 years ago)
Release date
10 November 2016 (5 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$399
$228
Price now
$745 (1.9x MSRP)
10.26
Value for money
5.96
GM107
GPU code name
Baffin
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro K2200M  vs  AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

640
Pipelines
1024
667 MHz
Core clock speed
1125 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
1,870 million
Transistor count
3,000 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
65 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
26.68
Texture fill rate
76.86
853.8 gflops
Floating-point performance
2,460 gflops
640
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1024
no data
Boost clock speed
1201 MHz
1,870 million
Number of transistors
3,000 million
65 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
50 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro K2200M and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

MXM-A (3.0)
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
None
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
5012 MHz
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
80 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
96 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100.

No outputs
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
1.2
Display Port
no data

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

5.0
CUDA
no data
+
Optimus
no data
+
3D Vision Pro
no data
+
Mosaic
no data
+
nView Display Management
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro K2200M and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.5
OpenGL
4.6
+
Vulkan
no data
5
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro K2200M and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro K2200M or AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

0.45% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($228 vs $745 (1.9x MSRP))

Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

More pipelines (1024 vs 640)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

Less power consumption (50 Watt vs 65 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (4 GB vs 2 GB)

More memory bandwidth (96 GB/s vs 80 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA Quadro K2200M or AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro K2200M .

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M versus AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.7 Out of 3 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 10 Hitesti Score