NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
VS
Quadro K200M
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
VS
Quadro K200M

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro K2000D  vs  Quadro K200M.

520
Place in performance rating
not rated
4.51
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
GK107
Code name
no data
Workstation
Type
no data
1 March 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
22 August 2014 (7 years ago)
$599
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$234 (0.4x MSRP)
Price now
no data
1.22
Value for money
no data
GK107
GPU code name
GK107
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro K2000D  vs  Quadro K200M in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

384
Pipelines
no data
954 MHz
Core clock speed
850 MHz
1,270 million
Transistor count
no data
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
51 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
30.53
Texture fill rate
13.60
732.7 gflops
Floating-point performance
326.4 gflops
384
Pipelines / CUDA cores
192
1,270 million
Number of transistors
1,270 million
51 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
35 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro K2000D and Quadro K200M come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
202 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs Quadro K200M.

GDDR5
Memory type
DDR3
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
4000 MHz
Memory clock speed
1600 MHz
64 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
12.8 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs Quadro K200M.

2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
CUDA
3.0

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro K2000D and Quadro K200M is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
+
Vulkan
1.1.126
no data
Shader Model
5.1
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro K2000D and Quadro K200M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro K2000D or Quadro K200M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
Quadro K200M
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
Quadro K200M
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
Quadro K200M
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
Quadro K200M
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
Quadro K200M
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

8.63% faster in synthetic tests

More maximum RAM amount (2 GB vs 1 GB)

More memory bandwidth (64 GB/s vs 12.8 GB/s)

Advantages of Quadro K200M

There is no accountable advantage

So, NVIDIA Quadro K2000D or Quadro K200M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro K2000D .

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D versus Quadro K200M performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Octane Render OctaneBench

Benchmark Octane Render OctaneBench: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Octane Render OctaneBench test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 4 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score