NVIDIA Quadro K2000
VS
NVIDIA NVS 315
NVIDIA Quadro K2000
VS
NVIDIA NVS 315

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro K2000  vs  NVIDIA NVS 315.

532
Place in performance rating
939
12.99
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GK107
Code name
GF119
Workstation
Type
Desktop
1 March 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
10 March 2013 (8 years ago)
$599
Launch price (MSRP)
$159
$1172 (2x MSRP)
Price now
$343 (2.2x MSRP)
0.23
Value for money
0.03
GK107
GPU code name
GF119
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro K2000  vs  NVIDIA NVS 315 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

384
Pipelines
48
954 MHz
Core clock speed
523 MHz
1,270 million
Transistor count
292 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
51 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
19 Watt
30.53
Texture fill rate
4.184
732.7 gflops
Floating-point performance
100.4 gflops
384
Pipelines / CUDA cores
48
1,270 million
Number of transistors
292 million
51 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
19 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro K2000 and NVIDIA NVS 315 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
202 mm
Length
145 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA NVS 315.

GDDR5
Memory type
DDR3
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
4000 MHz
Memory clock speed
1750 MHz
64 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
14 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA NVS 315.

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
1x DMS-59

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro K2000 and NVIDIA NVS 315 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
+
Vulkan
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro K2000 and NVIDIA NVS 315 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro K2000 or NVIDIA NVS 315 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2000
NVIDIA NVS 315
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2000
NVIDIA NVS 315
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2000
NVIDIA NVS 315
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2000
NVIDIA NVS 315
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2000
NVIDIA NVS 315
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K2000

5.77% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (384 vs 48)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (2 GB vs 1 GB)

More memory bandwidth (64 GB/s vs 14 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA NVS 315

Cheaper ($343 (2.2x MSRP) vs $1172 (2x MSRP))

Less power consumption (19 Watt vs 51 Watt)

So, NVIDIA Quadro K2000 or NVIDIA NVS 315?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro K2000 .

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 versus NVIDIA NVS 315 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Octane Render OctaneBench

Benchmark Octane Render OctaneBench: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Octane Render OctaneBench test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.9 Out of 18 Hitesti Score
4.7 Out of 17 Hitesti Score