NVIDIA NVS 5100M
VS
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
NVIDIA NVS 5100M
VS
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA NVS 5100M  vs  Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics.

1039
Place in performance rating
not rated
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Gen. 5 Arrandale
7 January 2010 (11 years ago)
Release date
10 January 2010 (11 years ago)
$25
Price now
no data
0.20
Value for money
no data
GT216
GPU code name
GMA HD
Workstation
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA NVS 5100M  vs  Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

550 MHz
Core clock speed
500 MHz
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
45 nm
8.800
Texture fill rate
no data
116.16 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
48
Pipelines / CUDA cores
12
486 million
Number of transistors
no data
35 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
35 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA NVS 5100M and Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

MXM-A (3.0)
Interface
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA NVS 5100M vs Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics.

GDDR3
Memory type
no data
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
128 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
1600 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
25.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA NVS 5100M vs Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics.

No outputs
Display Connectors
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA NVS 5100M and Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

no data
DirectX
DirectX 10, Shader 4.0

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA NVS 5100M and Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA NVS 5100M or Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA NVS 5100M
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA NVS 5100M
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA NVS 5100M
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA NVS 5100M
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA NVS 5100M
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA NVS 5100M

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 45 nm)

Advantages of Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics

0.26% faster in synthetic tests

So, NVIDIA NVS 5100M or Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics .

NVIDIA NVS 5100M versus Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics performance benchmarks comparison

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

2.6 Out of 8 Hitesti Score
2.8 Out of 16 Hitesti Score