NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti  vs  GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2.

306
Place in performance rating
not rated
28.77
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GM107
Code name
no data
Desktop
Type
no data
18 February 2014 (7 years ago)
Release date
27 November 2008 (13 years ago)
$149
Launch price (MSRP)
$299
$273 (1.8x MSRP)
Price now
no data
5.62
Value for money
no data
GM107
GPU code name
GT200B
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti  vs  GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

640
Pipelines
no data
1020 MHz
Core clock speed
576 MHz
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
1,870 million
Transistor count
no data
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
60 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
43.40
Texture fill rate
41.47
1,389 gflops
Floating-point performance
536.5 gflops
640
CUDA cores
no data
640
Pipelines / CUDA cores
216
1085 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
1,870 million
Number of transistors
1,400 million
60 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
171 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
5.7" (14.5 cm)
Length
267 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
PCI Express 3.0
Bus support
no data
4.376" (11.1 cm)
Height
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR3
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
448 Bit
5.4 GB/s
Memory clock speed
1998 MHz
86.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
111.9 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2.

One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
+
G-SYNC support
no data
4 displays
Multi monitor support
no data
+
HDCP
no data
2048x1536
Maximum VGA resolution
no data
Internal
Audio input for HDMI
no data
+
HDMI
no data

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

+
3D Vision
no data
+
GPU Boost
no data
+
CUDA
1.3
+
GeForce Experience
no data
+
Blu Ray 3D
no data
+
3D Gaming
no data
+
3D Vision Live
no data
+
FXAA
no data
+
TXAA
no data
+
Adaptive VSync
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1.126
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
1.2
OpenCL
1.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti or GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

19.06% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 55 nm)

G-SYNC support

Advantages of GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

More maximum RAM amount (896 MB vs 2 GB)

More memory bandwidth (111.9 GB/s vs 86.4 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti or GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti .

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti versus GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 performance benchmarks comparison

Unigine Heaven 4.0

Benchmark Unigine Heaven 4.0: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Unigine Heaven 4.0 test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Unigine Heaven 3.0

Benchmark Unigine Heaven 3.0: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Unigine Heaven 3.0 test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Octane Render OctaneBench

Benchmark Octane Render OctaneBench: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Octane Render OctaneBench test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

4.1 Out of 456 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 2 Hitesti Score