NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
VS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
VS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2  vs  AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling.

1725
Place in performance rating
not rated
0.41
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
GK208
Code name
Vega 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
29 May 2013
Release date
7 August 2017 (4 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$699
$66
Price now
$246 (0.4x MSRP)
no data
GPU code name
Vega 10
no data
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2  vs  AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

384
Pipelines
4096
902 MHz
Core clock speed
1408 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1668 MHz
915 million
Transistor count
12,500 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
25 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
345 Watt
28.86
Texture fill rate
427.0
692.7 gflops
Floating-point performance
14,336 gflops
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
4096
no data
Boost clock speed
1668 MHz
no data
Number of transistors
12,500 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
345 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x8
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
145 mm
Length
282 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
2x 8-pin

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling.

DDR3
Memory type
HBM2
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
2048 Bit
1800 MHz
Memory clock speed
1890 MHz
14.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
483.8 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling.

1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Display Connectors
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
no data
HDMI
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 or AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2

1.11% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($66 vs $246 (0.4x MSRP))

Less power consumption (25 Watt vs 345 Watt)

Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

More pipelines (4096 vs 384)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (8 GB vs 2 GB)

More memory bandwidth (483.8 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 or AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 .

NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 versus AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

4.3 Out of 7 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score